30-Year Fixed-Rate Mortgage Eases Just Below 5 Percent

26 02 2011

McLean, VA – Freddie Mac (OTC: FMCC) today released the results of its Primary Mortgage Market Survey® (PMMS®), which shows a drop in long-term fixed rates this week.

 30-year fixed-rate mortgage (FRM) averaged 4.95 percent with an average 0.6 point for the week ending February 24, 2011, down from last week when it averaged 5.0 percent. Last year at this time, the 30-year FRM averaged 5.05 percent.

15-year FRM this week averaged 4.22 percent with an average 0.7 point, down from last week when it averaged 4.27 percent. A year ago at this time, the 15-year FRM averaged 4.40 percent.

5-year Treasury-indexed hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) averaged 3.8 percent this week, with an average 0.6 point, down from last week when it averaged 3.87 percent. A year ago, the 5-year ARM averaged 4.16 percent.

1-year Treasury-indexed ARM averaged 3.40 percent this week with an average 0.6 point, up from last week when it averaged 3.39 percent. At this time last year, the 1-year ARM averaged 4.15 percent.

Frank Nothaft, vice president and chief economist at Freddie Mac, reports, “Fixed mortgage rates eased again this holiday week amid mixed inflation data reports. Although the core consumer price index for January rose slightly above the market consensus, house prices fell 4.1 percent in the fourth quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller® National Index . In addition, the level of the index was the lowest since the fourth quarter of 2002.”

“Low mortgage rates and home prices are sustaining affordability in the housing market. Existing home sales rose for the third consecutive month in January and were at the strongest pace in eight months, the National Association of Realtors® reported; only the Northeast region experienced a slowdown in sales.”





Fixed Mortgage Rates This Week Better For Borrowers

25 02 2011
by Ed Ferrara

An application for REALTORS®After slight movement early last week, mortgage rates ended up looking better for borrowers with a decrease of .125% for conforming 30 year and 15 year mortgage interest rates making them more competitive with FHA mortgage rates.

FreeRateUpdate.com’s daily survey of wholesale and direct lenders show that current 30 year fixed mortgage rates are at 4.750% and 15 year fixed mortgage rates are at 4.125%. 5/1 adjustable mortgage rates are at 3.250%. Still remaining below 5%, these are the best mortgage rates available with 0.7 to 1% origination fee to well qualified borrowers who can also meet lender approval.

FHA 5/1 adjustable mortgage rates increased .125% and are at 3.625%. >FHA 30 year fixed mortgage interest rates are at 4.625% and FHA 15 year fixed mortgage interest rates are at 4.000%, both remaining the same.

FHA mortgage loans continue to attract borrowers for the benefits they offer such as the low down payment requirement although FHA closing costs (APR) are higher due to the upfront mortgage insurance premium and other applicable FHA fees. Coming April 18th, FHA is increasing the annual mortgage insurance premium by .25% for FHA 30 year and FHA 15 year fixed rate mortgage loans.

Jumbo 15 year fixed mortgage rates saw the biggest jump increasing .250% and are at 5.250%. Jumbo 30 year fixed mortgage rates are at 5.500% and jumbo 5/1 ARM loan rates are at 4.125%, both remaining the same. Jumbo mortgage loans are available for borrowers in need of financing above the conforming loan limit which is $417,000 to $729,250 depending on location. Available with 0.7 to 1% origination fee, these low jumbo mortgage rates can still be obtained by borrowers who have outstanding credit.

MBS prices (mortgage backed securities) have fluctuated each day this past week depending on the news and investor reaction. Mortgage rates increase and decrease in the opposite direction of MBS prices. After Tuesday’s mixed results, mortgage rates stabilized for the rest of the week upon the release of the producer price index,, the consumer price index and housing starts which all came in better than expected.

FreeRateUpdate.com surveys more than two dozen wholesale and direct lenders’ rate sheets to determine the most accurate mortgage rates available to well qualified consumers at a standard .07 to 1 point origination.

Today’s New York Mortgage Rates





Existing-Home Sales Rise Again in January

25 02 2011

Washington, DC, February 23, 2011

The uptrend in existing-home sales continues, with January sales rising for the third consecutive month with a pace that is now above year-ago levels, according to the National Association of REALTORS®.

Existing-home sales1, which are completed transactions that include single-family, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops, increased 2.7 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.36 million in January from a downwardly revised 5.22 million in December, and are 5.3 percent above the 5.09 million level in January 2010. This is the first time in seven months that sales activity was higher than a year earlier.

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said the improvement is good but could be better. “The uptrend in home sales is consistent with improvements in the economy and jobs, which are helping boost consumer confidence,” Yun said. “The extremely favorable housing affordability conditions are a big factor, but buyers have been constrained by unnecessarily tight credit. As a result, there are abnormally high levels of all-cash purchases, along with rising investor activity.”

A parallel NAR practitioner survey2 shows first-time buyers purchased 29 percent of homes in January, down from 33 percent in December and 40 percent in January 2010 when an extended tax credit was in place.

Investors accounted for 23 percent of purchases in January, up from 20 percent in December and 17 percent in January 2010; the balance of sales were to repeat buyers. All-cash sales rose to 32 percent in January from 29 percent in December and 26 percent in January 2010.

“Increases in all-cash transactions, the investor market share and distressed home sales all go hand-in-hand. With tight credit standards, it’s not surprising to see so much activity where cash is king and investors are taking advantage of conditions to purchase undervalued homes,” Yun said.

All-cash purchases are at the highest level since NAR started measuring these purchases monthly in October 2008, when they accounted for 15 percent of the market. The average of all-cash deals was 20 percent in 2009, rising to 28 percent last year.

The national median existing-home price3 for all housing types was $158,800 in January, down 3.7 percent from January 2010. Distressed homes edged up to a 37 percent market share in January from 36 percent in December; it was 38 percent in January 2010.

NAR President Ron Phipps, broker-president of Phipps Realty in Warwick, R.I., said the median price is being dampened by unusual market factors. “Unprecedented levels of all-cash purchases, primarily of distressed homes sold at deep discounts, undoubtedly pulls the median price downward,” Phipps said. “Given the levels of inventory we see today, we believe that traditional homes in good condition have held their value.”

Total housing inventory at the end of January fell 5.1 percent to 3.38 million existing homes available for sale, which represents a 7.6-month supply4 at the current sales pace, down from an 8.2-month supply in December. The inventory supply is at the lowest level since December 2009 when there was a 7.3-month supply.

According to Freddie Mac, the national average commitment rate for a 30-year, conventional, fixed-rate mortgage rose to 4.76 percent in January from 4.71 percent in December; the rate was 5.03 percent in January 2010.

Single-family home sales rose 2.4 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.69 million in January from 4.58 million in December, and are 4.9 percent higher than the 4.47 million level in January 2010. The median existing single-family home price was $159,400 in January, down 2.7 percent from a year ago.

Existing condominium and co-op sales increased 4.7 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 670,000 in January from 640,000 in December, and are 7.9 percent above the 621,000-unit pace one year ago. The median existing condo price5 was $154,900 in January, which is 10.2 percent below January 2010.

Regionally, existing-home sales in the Northeast fell 4.6 percent to an annual pace of 830,000 in January from a spike in December and are 1.2 percent below January 2010. The median price in the Northeast was $236,500, which is 4.0 percent below a year ago.

Existing-home sales in the Midwest rose 1.8 percent in January to a level of 1.14 million and are 3.6 percent above a year ago. The median price in the Midwest was $126,300, which is 3.2 percent below January 2010.

In the South, existing-home sales increased 3.6 percent to an annual pace of 2.02 million in January and are 8.0 percent higher than January 2010. The median price in the South was $136,600, down 2.1 percent from a year ago.

Existing-home sales in the West rose 7.9 percent to an annual level of 1.37 million in January and are 7.0 percent above January 2010. The median price in the West was $193,200, down 5.7 percent from a year ago.

The National Association of REALTORS®, “The Voice for Real Estate,” is America’s largest trade association, representing 1.1 million members involved in all aspects of the residential and commercial real estate industries.

# # #

NOTE: NAR also tracks monthly comparisons of existing single-family home sales and median prices for select metropolitan statistical areas, which is posted with other tables at: www.realtor.org/research/research/ehsdata. For information on areas not included in the report, please contact the local association of REALTORS®.

1Existing-home sales, which include single-family, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops, are based on transaction closings. This differs from the U.S. Census Bureau’s series on new single-family home sales, which are based on contracts or the acceptance of a deposit. Because of these differences, it is not uncommon for each series to move in different directions in the same month. In addition, existing-home sales, which generally account for 85 to 90 percent of total home sales, are based on a much larger sample – more than 40 percent of multiple listing service data each month – and typically are not subject to large prior-month revisions.
The annual rate for a particular month represents what the total number of actual sales for a year would be if the relative pace for that month were maintained for 12 consecutive months. Seasonally adjusted annual rates are used in reporting monthly data to factor out seasonal variations in resale activity. For example, home sales volume is normally higher in the summer than in the winter, primarily because of differences in the weather and family buying patterns. However, seasonal factors cannot compensate for abnormal weather patterns.
Single-family data collection began monthly in 1968, while condo data collection began quarterly in 1981; the series were combined in 1999 when monthly collection of condo data began. Prior to this period, single-family homes accounted for more than nine out of 10 purchases. Historic comparisons for total home sales prior to 1999 are based on monthly single-family sales, combined with the corresponding quarterly sales rate for condos.

Also released today are historic data revisions. Each February, NAR Research incorporates a normal review of seasonal activity factors and fine-tunes historic data for the past three years based on the most recent findings. Revisions have been made to monthly seasonally adjusted annual sales rates for 2008 through 2010, as well as the inventory month’s supply data; most revisions are minor with little or no impact on previous characterizations of the overall market. There are no revisions to monthly home prices or raw inventory data (beyond normal prior-month revisions).

Note on Benchmark Revisions: All major statistical data series go through periodic reviews and revisions to ensure that sampling and methodology keep up with changes in the market, such as population changes in sampled areas, to ensure accuracy; we have been examining the existing-home sales data for any issues since late 2010. NAR began its normal process for benchmarking sales earlier this year; there will be no change to median prices. In the past we’ve benchmarked to the decennial Census, most recently to the 2000 Census, because it included home sales data. However, the data are no longer included in the Census, so we’re looking at more frequent benchmarking using a new approach with independent sources to improve our process and modeling. As always, we are consulting with various outside housing economists, government agencies and academic experts for a consensus on the methodology; NAR is committed to providing accurate, reliable data. Publication of the revisions is expected this summer.

2Distressed sales, first-time buyers, investors, all-cash transactions and data for contract cancellations, etc., are from a survey for the REALTORS® Confidence Index, scheduled to be posted March 14.

3The only valid comparisons for median prices are with the same period a year earlier due to the seasonality in buying patterns. Month-to-month comparisons do not compensate for seasonal changes, especially for the timing of family buying patterns. Changes in the composition of sales can distort median price data. Year-ago median and mean prices sometimes are revised in an automated process if more data is received than was originally reported.

4Total inventory and month’s supply data are available back through 1999, while single-family inventory and month’s supply are available back to 1982 (prior to 1999, condos were measured quarterly while single-family sales accounted for more than 90 percent of transactions).

5Because there is a concentration of condos in high-cost metro areas, the national median condo price generally is higher than the median single-family price. In a given market area, condos typically cost less than single-family homes.

Existing-home sales for February will be released March 21, the Pending Home Sales Index for February is scheduled for March 28, and the 2010 Vacation and Investment Home study will be published March 30; release times are 10:00 a.m. EDT.

Information about NAR is available at www.realtor.org. This and other news releases are posted in the News Media section. Statistical data in this release, other tables and surveys also may be found by clicking on Research.





Existing-Home Sales Rise Again in January

24 02 2011

Washington, DC, February 23, 2011

The uptrend in existing-home sales continues, with January sales rising for the third consecutive month with a pace that is now above year-ago levels, according to the National Association of REALTORS®.

Existing-home sales1, which are completed transactions that include single-family, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops, increased 2.7 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.36 million in January from a downwardly revised 5.22 million in December, and are 5.3 percent above the 5.09 million level in January 2010. This is the first time in seven months that sales activity was higher than a year earlier.

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said the improvement is good but could be better. “The uptrend in home sales is consistent with improvements in the economy and jobs, which are helping boost consumer confidence,” Yun said. “The extremely favorable housing affordability conditions are a big factor, but buyers have been constrained by unnecessarily tight credit. As a result, there are abnormally high levels of all-cash purchases, along with rising investor activity.”

A parallel NAR practitioner survey2 shows first-time buyers purchased 29 percent of homes in January, down from 33 percent in December and 40 percent in January 2010 when an extended tax credit was in place.

Investors accounted for 23 percent of purchases in January, up from 20 percent in December and 17 percent in January 2010; the balance of sales were to repeat buyers. All-cash sales rose to 32 percent in January from 29 percent in December and 26 percent in January 2010.

“Increases in all-cash transactions, the investor market share and distressed home sales all go hand-in-hand. With tight credit standards, it’s not surprising to see so much activity where cash is king and investors are taking advantage of conditions to purchase undervalued homes,” Yun said.

All-cash purchases are at the highest level since NAR started measuring these purchases monthly in October 2008, when they accounted for 15 percent of the market. The average of all-cash deals was 20 percent in 2009, rising to 28 percent last year.

The national median existing-home price3 for all housing types was $158,800 in January, down 3.7 percent from January 2010. Distressed homes edged up to a 37 percent market share in January from 36 percent in December; it was 38 percent in January 2010.

NAR President Ron Phipps, broker-president of Phipps Realty in Warwick, R.I., said the median price is being dampened by unusual market factors. “Unprecedented levels of all-cash purchases, primarily of distressed homes sold at deep discounts, undoubtedly pulls the median price downward,” Phipps said. “Given the levels of inventory we see today, we believe that traditional homes in good condition have held their value.”

Total housing inventory at the end of January fell 5.1 percent to 3.38 million existing homes available for sale, which represents a 7.6-month supply4 at the current sales pace, down from an 8.2-month supply in December. The inventory supply is at the lowest level since December 2009 when there was a 7.3-month supply.

According to Freddie Mac, the national average commitment rate for a 30-year, conventional, fixed-rate mortgage rose to 4.76 percent in January from 4.71 percent in December; the rate was 5.03 percent in January 2010.

Single-family home sales rose 2.4 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.69 million in January from 4.58 million in December, and are 4.9 percent higher than the 4.47 million level in January 2010. The median existing single-family home price was $159,400 in January, down 2.7 percent from a year ago.

Existing condominium and co-op sales increased 4.7 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 670,000 in January from 640,000 in December, and are 7.9 percent above the 621,000-unit pace one year ago. The median existing condo price5 was $154,900 in January, which is 10.2 percent below January 2010.

Regionally, existing-home sales in the Northeast fell 4.6 percent to an annual pace of 830,000 in January from a spike in December and are 1.2 percent below January 2010. The median price in the Northeast was $236,500, which is 4.0 percent below a year ago.

Existing-home sales in the Midwest rose 1.8 percent in January to a level of 1.14 million and are 3.6 percent above a year ago. The median price in the Midwest was $126,300, which is 3.2 percent below January 2010.

In the South, existing-home sales increased 3.6 percent to an annual pace of 2.02 million in January and are 8.0 percent higher than January 2010. The median price in the South was $136,600, down 2.1 percent from a year ago.

Existing-home sales in the West rose 7.9 percent to an annual level of 1.37 million in January and are 7.0 percent above January 2010. The median price in the West was $193,200, down 5.7 percent from a year ago.

The National Association of REALTORS®, “The Voice for Real Estate,” is America’s largest trade association, representing 1.1 million members involved in all aspects of the residential and commercial real estate industries.

# # #

NOTE: NAR also tracks monthly comparisons of existing single-family home sales and median prices for select metropolitan statistical areas, which is posted with other tables at: www.realtor.org/research/research/ehsdata. For information on areas not included in the report, please contact the local association of REALTORS®.

1Existing-home sales, which include single-family, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops, are based on transaction closings. This differs from the U.S. Census Bureau’s series on new single-family home sales, which are based on contracts or the acceptance of a deposit. Because of these differences, it is not uncommon for each series to move in different directions in the same month. In addition, existing-home sales, which generally account for 85 to 90 percent of total home sales, are based on a much larger sample – more than 40 percent of multiple listing service data each month – and typically are not subject to large prior-month revisions.
The annual rate for a particular month represents what the total number of actual sales for a year would be if the relative pace for that month were maintained for 12 consecutive months. Seasonally adjusted annual rates are used in reporting monthly data to factor out seasonal variations in resale activity. For example, home sales volume is normally higher in the summer than in the winter, primarily because of differences in the weather and family buying patterns. However, seasonal factors cannot compensate for abnormal weather patterns.
Single-family data collection began monthly in 1968, while condo data collection began quarterly in 1981; the series were combined in 1999 when monthly collection of condo data began. Prior to this period, single-family homes accounted for more than nine out of 10 purchases. Historic comparisons for total home sales prior to 1999 are based on monthly single-family sales, combined with the corresponding quarterly sales rate for condos.

Also released today are historic data revisions. Each February, NAR Research incorporates a normal review of seasonal activity factors and fine-tunes historic data for the past three years based on the most recent findings. Revisions have been made to monthly seasonally adjusted annual sales rates for 2008 through 2010, as well as the inventory month’s supply data; most revisions are minor with little or no impact on previous characterizations of the overall market. There are no revisions to monthly home prices or raw inventory data (beyond normal prior-month revisions).

Note on Benchmark Revisions: All major statistical data series go through periodic reviews and revisions to ensure that sampling and methodology keep up with changes in the market, such as population changes in sampled areas, to ensure accuracy; we have been examining the existing-home sales data for any issues since late 2010. NAR began its normal process for benchmarking sales earlier this year; there will be no change to median prices. In the past we’ve benchmarked to the decennial Census, most recently to the 2000 Census, because it included home sales data. However, the data are no longer included in the Census, so we’re looking at more frequent benchmarking using a new approach with independent sources to improve our process and modeling. As always, we are consulting with various outside housing economists, government agencies and academic experts for a consensus on the methodology; NAR is committed to providing accurate, reliable data. Publication of the revisions is expected this summer.

2Distressed sales, first-time buyers, investors, all-cash transactions and data for contract cancellations, etc., are from a survey for the REALTORS® Confidence Index, scheduled to be posted March 14.

3The only valid comparisons for median prices are with the same period a year earlier due to the seasonality in buying patterns. Month-to-month comparisons do not compensate for seasonal changes, especially for the timing of family buying patterns. Changes in the composition of sales can distort median price data. Year-ago median and mean prices sometimes are revised in an automated process if more data is received than was originally reported.

4Total inventory and month’s supply data are available back through 1999, while single-family inventory and month’s supply are available back to 1982 (prior to 1999, condos were measured quarterly while single-family sales accounted for more than 90 percent of transactions).

5Because there is a concentration of condos in high-cost metro areas, the national median condo price generally is higher than the median single-family price. In a given market area, condos typically cost less than single-family homes.

Existing-home sales for February will be released March 21, the Pending Home Sales Index for February is scheduled for March 28, and the 2010 Vacation and Investment Home study will be published March 30; release times are 10:00 a.m. EDT.

Information about NAR is available at www.realtor.org. This and other news releases are posted in the News Media section. Statistical data in this release, other tables and surveys also may be found by clicking on Research.





23 02 2011

Hi,

Real Estate would like to invite you to join Facebook.

Once you join, you’ll be able to connect with the Real Estate Page, along with people you care about and other things that interest you.

Thanks,
Real Estate

To join Facebook, please follow the link below:
http://ping.fm/h6OPK

You are receiving this email from Real Estate. Real Estate has sent you this message through Facebook. If you no longer want to receive messages through Facebook, click the link below.
http://ping.fm/tYEJ4
Facebook, Inc. P.O. Box 10005, Palo Alto, CA 94303





Don’t Be Mystified By The Mortgage Maze

22 02 2011
by Broderick Perkins
Years after the housing market tanked and sank the economy, more than 70 percent of Americans say getting a mortgage today is a serious national problem, according to a new study by MortgageMatch.com, a home loan and information site operated by Move, Inc.

According to the MortgageMatch.com survey, today’s lending environment is so confusing many borrowers are experiencing high levels of stress and frustration.

More than one in five recent home buyers (20.9 percent) told MortgageMatch.com, waiting to hear if they were approved for a mortgage was more stressful than waiting to hear if they got a job.

MortgageMatch.com says home buyers can significantly improve their chances of getting a mortgage application approved on the best possible terms in today’s tough lending marketplace by taking the following steps.

• Pay down your debt as much as you can before applying for a mortgage.

Lenders calculate the ratio of your debt to your income to determine how much you can afford to borrow. Your total debt-to-income is based on how much of your gross income would go toward all of your debt obligations, including mortgage, car loans, child support and alimony, credit card bills, student loans and condominium fees.

By reducing your debt as much as you can, you will improve your debt-to-income ratio and your credit score.

• Clean up your credit long before you apply for a mortgage.

Credit is critical today, not just to get a mortgage but to get the best terms. A marginal credit score can cost you tens of thousands of dollars over the life of the loan. Your score on the 850-point FICO credit rating scale must be 680 today to qualify for a prime loan and at least 720 to get the best rates.

Pull one or all of your three annual credit reports from AnnualCreditReport.com and check yourself, before you wreck yourself.

You’ll have to pay a nominal fee of $10 to $15 to each credit bureau — Equifax, Experian and TransUnion — to get your credit score. Review your report for errors and omissions.

• Don’t make a major purchase on credit and don’t apply for new credit before you apply for a mortgage or at any point before your mortgage closes. Purchases and credit accounts increase your debt and hurt your debt-to-income ratio.

• Increase your down payment. The more you put down the better your rate and your chances at scoring on that loan application. If you can’t increase your money down, buy a cheaper home. Now is not the time to stretch.

• Get all your docs in a row before you apply for a mortgage. Don’t waste time or raise the ire of lenders who are tougher than ever on documentation for income, assets, financial obligations and more. When you apply, have your paperwork ready.

• Know and prepare for your cash requirements. Cash expenses, beyond the down payment can crush you. Closings costs are on the rise. They can include transfer taxes, lenders fees, title insurance, escrow, settlement and home inspection costs. Also upfront property taxes, homeowner association dues homeowner insurance and other costs could come due before you close.

• Larger loans raise your costs. So called “jumbo mortgages” exceed the $417,000 “conforming loan level” in most parts of the country. In high cost areas like New York City, Washington D.C., Miami, and many parts of California, jumbos begin at $729,750. Larger mortgages are more risky so they cost more, require better credit and demand larger down payments.

• Negotiate tough. Ask for a purchase price lower than the value. A lower price serves both you by lowering your loan-to-value ratio and your lender, by reducing its risk. In today’s marketplace, many sellers are willing to deal. Go for it.

Don’t get taken. When you see rates attractive rates advertised on the Internet or TV don’t froth. They could be come-on or teaser rates with lots of strings attached. In addition, rates change several times during the day and differ by locale, by borrower, by loan-to-value ratio and due to a host of other factors. Advertised rates maybe be what you see, but they are often not what you get.





Thought of the Day

22 02 2011

Keeping our motives honest

Motives are important in dealing with other people. If we’re frank with someone and that person gets upset, we might think he or she just can’t handle our directness, our honesty. But “honesty” without love is more like brutal frankness. If we want to be confrontational, we have to put up with the consequences.

But what is the real reason for being confrontational (“honest”), for pointing out others’ flaws? Are we perhaps afraid that our own flaws will be discovered? Are we protecting ourselves by focusing attention on others?

Are my motives always honest?

Higher Power, help me see where my motives are selfish or mean or petty, so that I stay honest in my program. 





Realty Times – Homeownership’s Amazing Benefits

21 02 2011
Homeownership’s Amazing Benefits

Homeownership brings with it a host of amazing benefits. It’s the American Dream for good reason. From health to wealth, it stands out as a great long-term investment, and that’s why 67 percent of American households are owner-occupied.

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) knows a little something about how homeownership affects American lives. And that’s why they are getting the word out about why you should be a homeowner. According to NAR:

     

  • Homeowners are happier and healthier and enjoy a greater feeling of control over their lives. 
  • Homeowners pay 80% to 90% of federal income taxes, contributing to federal programs that benefit all Americans. 
  • Most homeowners enjoy stable housing costs—a fixed rate mortgage payment might not change for 15 or 30 years while rent typically increases 3% a year. 
  • Children of homeowners … are more likely to participate in organized activities and spend less time in front of the television. 
  • People who own their own homes … volunteer more and contribute more to their neighborhoods. 
  • Home owners do not move as frequently as renters, providing more neighborhood stability. In turn, this stability helps reduce crime and supports neighborhood upkeep. Children of home owners do better in school, stay in school longer …

Many economists have been touting a jobs recovery as the key to the housing recovery, but perhaps it is the other way around.

Recent indicates that housing makes up more than 15 percent of our Gross Domestic, and for every home purchased, up to $60,000 is pushed into the economy over time in improvements and furniture.

Additionally, each home sale touches 80 different occupations!

According to the NAR, “America needs jobs. Housing creates jobs. That’s one of the many reasons home ownership matters to people, to communities, to America. Strong federal government support of home ownership equals strong support for American jobs. We urge the Obama Administration and the U.S. Congress—as they debate the new federal budget and reform proposals for the nation’s mortgage finance system—to continue federal support for home ownership.”





The Real Estate Report

14 02 2011
February 2011 Volume 22 No. 2
 
Valentine’s Day at Home Between the Champagne, prix fixe dinner and a dozen roses, the costs of a romantic night out for Valentine’s Day can quickly add up and might end up being more than you can afford in these tough economic times. This year if money is tight, consider treating your sweetheart to a romantic evening in your own home. This DIY alternative is not only more intimate and less expensive, it also allows you to be more creative and thoughtful in showing your appreciation for your significant other.

Here are a couple ideas for celebrating Valentine’s Day in your own home:

  • If you have a fireplace, light it up! If you don’t, this is the perfect occasion to use the soy candle set your sister got you for Christmas.
  • If you’re not an experienced chef, don’t worry—there are plenty of simple recipes for beginners that will still look impressive arranged on your best dinnerware. Many Italian dishes like pizza or spaghetti are cost-effective and fun to make. If you are looking for a less traditional alternative, have breakfast in bed or a picnic on your living room floor.
  • Champagne is typically seen as an expensive drink, but this doesn’t have to be the case. Skip the French vintage and opt for a nice Spanish cava or Italian prosecco, both of which offer many quality selections under $25.
  • This Valentine’s Day, don’t just think pink—think green! What better way to show your sweetheart you care than by showing your love for the planet you inhabit? Make your meal from organic ingredients, buy a recycled card and buy your flowers from a local farmer.

This year for Valentine’s Day, don’t stress over trying to get a reservation at an expensive steakhouse. Instead, celebrate your love in the most romantic and intimate setting possible—your own home.

Back to the top

 

 
Green RemodelingIf you are looking for an exotic way to spruce up your home in 2011, consider using natural building materials. Not only are many of the choices in green building more cost-effective than synthetic alternatives, many times they are more stylish and better for your planet.

If you are trying to be environmentally conscious in your home redesign, recycled materials should be used whenever possible. You can find carpets made from 100% recycled content and even countertops, walls and floors that blend recycled glass with concrete.

When choosing lumber, look for materials that come from certified and managed forests, like Brazilian Cherry or White Tigerwood, or recycled or reclaimed wood. You can also seek out wood floors made from wood and sisal, a natural grasslike fiber.

Another great way to give back to the environment without breaking the bank is with a tankless water heater. They are either gas or electric, although electric tankless water heaters cost less, while gas is more cost efficient. Tankless water heaters only heat water on demand, so you never run out of hot water and you aren’t wasting electricity by heating water when you aren’t using it. Installing a programmable thermostat, which you can program to automatically adjust to your heating or cooling needs up to four times a day, can also help lower your electric bill.

If you’re thinking of repainting, be sure to choose a line with low- or no-VOCs. VOCs are volatile organic compounds, an air pollutant that includes toxic solvents and formaldehyde. These components are dangerous for you, your family and the environment, so try to avoid them if at all possible.

Back to the top





18.4 Million Vacant Homes in the U.S.A.

2 02 2011

If you are still trying to understand why the housing market in the United States is in trouble just read the following paragraph.

Now to vacancies. There were 18.4 million vacant homes in the U.S. in Q4 ’10 (11 percent of all housing units vacant all year round), which is actually an improvement of 427,000 from a year ago, but not for the reasons you’d think.

The number of vacant homes for rent fell by 493 thousand, as rental demand rose. 471,000 homes are listed as “Held off Market” about half for temporary use, but the other half are likely foreclosures. And no, the shadow inventory isn’t just 200,000, it’s far higher than that.

So think about it. Eleven percent of the houses in America are empty. This as builders start to get more bullish, and renting apartments becomes ever more popular. Vacancies in the apartment sector have been falling steadily and dramatically, why? Because we’re still recovering emotionally from the toll of the housing crash. via Diana Olick at CNBC

11 percent or 18.4 million homes in the United States are empty.

To put this in perspective there is only 329,000 homes expected to be built this year.

So lets do the math.

Used Vacant homes / New Home Construction

18,400,000 / 329,000

This means there are 55 EMPTY HOMES for every NEW HOME BEING BUILT THIS YEAR.

Now lets do one last bit of math:

Used Vacant Homes / Home Sales for 2010

18,400,000 / 5,000,000

There is 3.86 empty homes for every home sold last year.

Gulp…








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.